A Comment About

Iranian Nukes = The End of the World as We Know It

May 7, 2008 - 12:00 am - by Gordon G. Chang
Bogdan of Australia
2008-05-08 01:11:11

John Samford, that was an excelent opinion of yours. I have to agree with every word you wrote. Quite frankly, if Bush fails to act now it will mean the inglorious end of the US as a super-power, and an enormous encouragement for the world’s terrorist and totallitarian regimes to lounch the final assault on democracy. There is no doubt that from the military point of view the intervention in Iran would be a rather small beer and it would be much better to face Islamofascist terrorist response today that lets say in three-five years, when they could come into posession of the WMD. If we are affraid to act now, when Iran is relatively weak what options will we have when her regime is armed with nukes? Practically none. I haven’t known that the US president has to his disposal such a wide margin of freedom in conducting serious military operations before he could be made accountable or eventually stopped by a Congress. Prhaps he will use that freedom to do something. That was something I have been believing in as a long time, unflinching supporter and admirer of Bush. However I began having my serious doubt about his resolve when watching his administration’s absolutely ridiculous, absurd diplomatic chicanery in dealing with the matter of Middle East’s “peace process” and above all with the question of North Korea’s nuclear program. So I tend to believe that Bush has simply given up…