This thread has been ridiculous since Chichiwoda entered it. He is clearly a Marxist… and an “educated” one. They practice this stupid “dialectic”. Their beginning premises are always false, so it is a waste of time to argue with them.
They refuse to ever admit that their premises are always belied by empirical results. Marxism of every form always fails. Always. They are also always atheistic and proud of it. They are always anti-God, and so, it always lead to a slaughter of dissidents and to bondage. They always sound so intellectual, but it is always pseudo-intellectualism. You’re just arguing with a pig. You both get dirty… and the pig likes it!
As for liking Krugman, well, every time I turn around, he opposes things which turn out to work, and endorses things which don’t. He, too, is always disproven by events, but refuses to change his theories to fit the evidence. Such is the mark of the pseudo-intellectual, aka, ideologue.
