Just to correct what one poster said, the March 2008 issue of SciAm doesn’t contain an article questioning the Big Bang. You can look it up!
Secondly, If any ID adherent can tell us how “God/The Designer must have done it” is science, I would like to hear it. If you can’t prove God’s existence how can you prove that he’s the Designer?
Thirdly, if an ID adherent would like to lay out a grant proposal that would lead to reproducible results supporting ID, let’s hear it. And then tell us what would falsify ID. That’s a challenge to every ID person posting here.
Fourth, the ignorance among the right regarding Darwin is simply astounding. Coulter, Limbaugh, Stein, that cretin Tom Bethell, all feel free to pontificate w/o having the slightest idea of what science is, let alone “darwinism”. As a conservative , I am deeply embarrassed when I read the idiocy they put forward.
Finally, the arguments about “truth” are just lame. Mathematicians are interested in “proof”, not “truth”, though they will tell you that a math proof is as true a statement that there is.
Scientists don’t seek truth, they seek knowledge. They all know that their knowledge is contingent, subject to being superseded.
ID adherents betray their anti-science stance when they claim to have found “the answer”, one that will never change. NOthing contingent in their “science”!
