> Uh, how many Americans have illegally gone across the border into Mexico? How many brave the desert and pay a coyote to be smuggled INTO Mexico? Name me ONE. Yeah they do. Legally. Your point?
My point is how do you think you’ll get that many legal crossings of people and trucks while still stopping illegal traffic? Because you squeeze so hard the legal traffic will slow so much people would stop crossing altogether. We say this after 9/11 though I fully supported the extra security. Relaxing it had to be done to get business done and legal traffic across. You build a wall it won’t help unless you squeeze the points of entry hard. The way you cross quickly is to get registered ahead of time as legit so you can go through quickly without being checked. That is the way all security works. The lines are backed up for two hours now with nothing to declare and a bicycle (or on foot) so some guy can ask you two questions and wave you through.
> On many military areas where there are signs that say USE OF DEADLY FORCE AUTHORISED. In Dreamland where any plane that strays into that restricted airspace is likely to be shot down without warning. Where trespassers can be shot on sight.
You can authorize whatever you want, but you won’t get US troops shooting at US citizens. The police and private security are a different matter. You can’t use US troops unless you can convince the american people that it is a matter of high national security, and the problem is your Paleo brethren keep losing elections. Soldiers won’t do it, and Congress won’t let them. We had US troops on the Texas border shoot some folk in the 90′s and it caused an uproar even in Congress.
> Thank you, your liberalism is exposed at last.Thats twice you’ve invoked Iraq. The cases aren’t parallel, you know it, I know it.
They are, and why won’t you give the reason you think they aren’t? What is the relevant difference that Mexico is different than Colombia regarding military partnership? You answer is to say “nu-uh”?
