G Vinson wrote:
…or perhaps simply Berlinski, since he has already agreed publically to the debate (which you ignored).
Or is he disqualified since he is not a “Creationists” (hiss hiss)?
Not sure if you were responding to Derb or me. Personally, I would love to see Derb take on Berlinski on this issue. The fact that he’s not a creationist would certainly deprive Derb of the use of the arrows he keeps in his ‘anti-creationist’ quiver (then again, given his response to Berlinski here, maybe not.
That said, I would love to see Derb follow through and debate a creationist on the issue – mainly because of his clear implications that 1) the issue is a ‘slam dunk’ for evoltution; and 2) creationists are unwilling to deal with the topic.
How about it Derb? Take on Berlinski and then a creationist! Here’s your chance to strike another blow for the cause!
