Griefer:
Susskind? Are you certain you want to go there?
Susskind, when asked about the possibility of a failure to establish the multi-verse theory, (would that leave us with ID) he says – “I doubt that physicists will see it that way. If, for some unforeseen reason, the landscape turns out to be inconsistent – maybe for mathematical reasons, or because it disagrees with observation – I am pretty sure that physicists will go on searching for natural explanations of the world. But I have to say that if that happens, as things stand now we will be in a very awkward position. Without any explanation of nature’s fine-tunings we will be hard pressed to answer the ID critics”.
Four things are in complete display. 1) there is a rush to get an explanation 2) because one does NOT exist (griefer), and 3) ID is the explanation to beat, 4) ID explains natures OBSERVED fine-tuning, where materialism cannot.
Wow, a theory that actually fits the evidence. Its that whole “First Cause” thing. Poor materialists, they wished the laws of nature could just be excused when it gets hot in the kitchen.
(Biology has been getting away with it for at least 50 years.)
