A Comment About

The Scientific Embrace of Atheism

April 28, 2008 - 12:00 am - by David Berlinski
FP
2008-04-28 16:54:15

Um…

These atheists you point to are mostly liberal feminists first and scientists second. (This is relevant.) Most scientists –just like with people– are idiots and fools (and crypto motivated by events from childhood).

Cause and effect is why things do what they do. Period. Natural Selection is cause and effect on the scale of biology.

If god did ordain this from the beginning, so be it; if he sees and saw all the branching implications –_times 15 billion years (and continuing)_ of the particles, from the immense to minute, colliding and coalescing, with further branching implications– then he is The Great Savant indeed.

Natural Selection means different baby variations occur –because of cause and effect. Only some babies go on to eat and breed –as unwittingly decided by the local environment. If environments remain relatively unchanged for multigenerations, then this selection leads to family ‘types’ forming. As environments shift over time –because of cause and effect– different family types get selected. (This is why we see around us now and in earth’s record, different types of whatever: whales and dolphins, wolves and foxes, monkeys and chimps etc etc.)

“Evolution” does not mean “better”; better is not synonymous with “forward moving time”.

Better/good/ moral etc are relative constructs…

Eg a billard ball moves into a billard-table pocket (because of cause and effect). Is this contingency of the Universe ‘good or bad’? …It depends on what the observer wants /who’s side the observer is on.

Science facts don’t have to lead to any ‘commercial benefit’, in order to be facts.

Apparently-commercially-irrelevent facts might have relevancy on a scale beyond your limited scope.

Stupid people should be eliminated –if their slave labors are not needed by the smart any more– …”so that the [neo cortex] shall not perish form the earth”. ‘Natural selection’ allows Man to understand that very clearly.

Creationists (and all delusionoids and ignoramuses) should _not_ be enlightened; educating the blind is not cost effective (science lets us understand that in excrutiating bean-counting detail too). They should be purged (along with feminists).

The god module (a mental-delusion creator so as to reset the shock of ‘seeing’, or rather ‘optimism’ on the grand scale) has been naturally selected. Most convictions (including NON-deist ones –ie feminism, ‘atheism’ etc) are the continutation of the god module’s compeling force; Compeling us to believe hope-giving nonsense which holds together groups of hive vs hive combatants in the grand Natural Selection scheme of things.

========
No one needs “science” to be an “atheists”…

Nature is red in tooth and claw as its main bio motor. It is horribly painful and bloody on a good day.

Either The Great Savant did this or is too weak to stop it.

Man begs mercy from a fiend or a fraud.