Why shouldn’t an article concerning rape – a crime whose victims are over 90% female – speak predominantly to the female sex?
Well, according to Mac Donald, these “sluts” aren’t victims, are they? They’re not being raped, are they?
There is no reason why Mac Donald’s article should be aimed at women. Why should it be?
It is not directly addressed to college women, but talks about them in the third person, through the hypothetical mouthpiece of “rape industrialists”. This in itself indicates that Mac Donald is not concerned with women’s welfare so much as berating them. And of course, in doing so, she earns the approval of men, as shown on this thread. Her comments reassure men that not all women are like those nasty feminists, and some know how to behave themselves, and let boys be boys.
It takes two to indulge in the kind of drunken hook-ups she criticises. If it isn’t rape then it is 50:50. But if it is rape or “rape”, then the perpetrators are men. If anything, therefore, she should be talking more about what men do than what women do.
If she were talking about a crime committed largely by blacks on whites – mugging, for instance – wouldn’t it be a little odd if all her argument focused on what whites could do to avoid being mugged, and none on what blacks should do to avoid mugging? Mac Donald, on past form, would certainly not do this.
Ironically, Mac Donald, who likes to ally with “superior” whites on other crimes, embraces “inferior” non-Western standards on the matter of rape.
