Hillary Clinton talking about electability? Touting she was outspent 3 to 1? News flash… She was outspent 3 to 1 becuase Obama was able to raise a lot more money from many more contributors than she has been able to. If you want to talk about electability, go ahead. Remember that one of the most important attributes to be electable is having the ability to raise money – something Obama has had no problem with.
She also gabs about winning the big states. Give me a break. You have to be pretty ignorant to think that a state like California is going to go for McCain. They would rather vote for Fidel Castro if he were running for the democratic party. An exageration perhaps, but you get the idea.
Speaking as a republican, if Obama wins the nomination, I might possibly vote for him. Although it’s probably not in the interest of my own pocketbook, if it’s for a greater good, I am willing to sacrifice, pay higher taxes, etc. If it is Clinton – you can guarantee it will motivate a huge portion of republicans to register and vote – because we cannot stand Hillary.
