“Women have all the control in normal sexual encounters they can deny or agree. If they want to be not called tramps then that is within their control.”
So then it is your absolute right to call a girl a tramp, bimbo, whore, etc., if she exercises her sexuality? How old and tired. Yes, we DO have control over when and with whom we choose to have sex. Or if we rather not have it at all. Sadly there are some girls who don’t quite see the ignorance and envy behind the callers of such words. I’ve always suspected men and some nasty women will always try to control what they cannot have, through either force or name calling. Sad.
I am gratefull that the American Justice system has the laws to protect women that exists today that didn’t exist yesterday. In that way it DOES even the playing field. “Nice” girls and bad girls both, get raped. As we’ve all read in any number of cases, the girl in the burqa is raped just as easily and frequently as the girl dressed in less. So basically this name-called holds little substance. No longer can a woman’s sexual promiscuity be a defence of the rapist, because the law sees that a woman truly does have the same right of sexual pleasure as do men. As long as the courts have caught up and have a clue, I frankly couldn’t give a damn whether an idiot with a limited vocabulary and a double standard doesn’t.
“Why should a male who wants sex anyway he can get it feel bad if women foolishly allows themselves to give sex because they decided to get wasted?”
No, he shouldn’t feel bad. Not if the sex was consentual. He should feel fright, however, if it wasn’t. Since the courts know full well and readily acknowledge “males wants sex anyway he can get it,” it’ll remain the woman’s words against his in the majority of date rape case.
