Shadow: Do you ever present a affirmative argument replete with facts and citations? All I see from you is clever lefty cliches and cute word twisting. You never refute the arguments but only chip away at the outside and then use broad brush ad hominen attacks. For instance:
“It is a fascinating study of how people’s biases shape what they accept as facts – It is strikingly similar to the way the nutty islamic fnatics think – Like Obama and the West caused the riots against the election in Iran.”
I’ve seen better argument from a fifth-grader which is basically what you tried here with this attachment of conservative wingnuts to islamic wingnuts…
I guess because of your status as an enlightened lefty, you do not have any biases thus your arguments are based solely on facts-facts you neglect to produce to support your arguments… Is this your proposition?
