mylai said:
“Which really is why laws are changing in defense of girls who find themselves in sexual situations while drunk, because boys don’t care enough NOT to have sex with drunk chicks, thinking that they will always get away with it. Then find themselves in situation where they have to defend their bad decision.”
“Since our Justice system understands the issue of consent better that idiot Heather and makes the man’s share of this type of drunk sex a legal problem for HIM. Because our Justice system does realize that some men (someone said perhaps 99%) would not think twice about banging an unconscious girl. However, many men and some idiot women think the LEGAL part of the burden for the man is terribly unfair – basically saying that men should not only NOT have to claim responsibility to the sex he just had with a girl who passes out during sex but also claim the right to feel free to think that drunk-girl probably deserved it because “good girls aren’t suppose to get drunk.” This is basically Heather’s argument. Which Mary rightfully thinks is unreasonable.”
So.. if they are both drunk, which one gets a life destroying felony charge? And what if he is drunk and she is relatively sober? Think carefully before answering. We don’t want any double standards here.
I am looking forward (not really) to the case where some bimbo gets slobbering drunk, wakes the next morning with a pounding headache, can’t remember who or how many people she banged the night before, can’t find her dress, let alone her panties, stumbles out of her front door into the grip of the police while TV cameras roll, is accused of multiple counts of felony sexual assault and goes to prison for twelve years.
To paraphrase John Cleese as Dennis Moore; this gender equality thing is harder than I thought.
