nuke primacy will solve every little problem, though, wont it?
if russia and china wont knuckle under to israeli american “benevolent global hegemony”, we will demonstrate our benevolence by nuking them… such a deal.
.
from the council on foreign relations foreign affairs March/April 2006…
“the sort of missile defenses that the United States might plausibly deploy would be valuable primarily in an offensive context, not a defensive one — as an adjunct to a U.S. first-strike capability, not as a standalone shield. If the United States launched a nuclear attack against Russia (or China), the targeted country would be left with a tiny surviving arsenal — if any at all.
At that point, even a relatively modest or inefficient missile-defense system might well be enough to protect against any retaliatory strikes, because the devastated enemy would have so few warheads and decoys left.”
benevolent global hegemony, here we come!!!
nuclear fimbulwinter solves the global warming problem for four or five years, at least until the big chunks settle out and quit shading us…
…too bad those chunks will glow in the dark, and so will we.
