TO: FP
RE: Knowing Your ‘Enemy’
“I do know my enemy.” — FP
I have serious doubts to your veracity here.
Allow me to point out WHY.
“By “real christians” you really mean cults from the outback.” — FP
You don’t know me, buckie. Especially with THAT comment. Or are you a columnist for the WaPo?
I crossed swords with one of them back in the 90s about this sort of disingenuous tripe.
Ask Amy about my back ground. Maybe she’ll even tell the truth.
““Real christianity’s” belief regarding females (or anything else) is a manifestation of the rustic pyschological effect that occured during the colonial occupation of the continent.” — FP
Please re-read my reply to your latest (immediately above).
“The mainstream of christianity is christianity and it is liberal at its psychological root and it always has been. From its inception through its entire history in Europe, it is a cult of infantiles and slave dolts getting rid of the better men; this ultimately leads to “feminism”, the same way geting rid of the alpha male wolves leads to a she-wolf coup against the puppy males that are left over.” — FP
Please re-read my reply to your latest (immediately above).
“The fact so called “real christians” (the various neo-masculine cults of the rustic american out back) allowed themselves to
be so easily marginalized and demonized (and if we are to believe that they are the “real christians” then also “hijacked and
redefined”) and _conscripted_ as warriors against themselves is all I need to know about my enemies and my allies.” — FP
Please re-read my reply to your latest (immediately above).
“If you have a need to believe in the boogieman in the sky who looks out for you and is always on “your” side whatever your biologic compunction, then Islam is a much better way to go. It at its inception is a society creator, while christianty is a society destroyer (first Rome than the North Euro out back). Note though (and this is a problem): If Euro males did convert to Islam, I presume that they –and especially the north western types– being left over puppies, would warp islam into a chivalrous feminist religion.” — FP
Please re-read my reply to your latest (immediately above).
“Christianity has had plenty of time to put up a successful contest to liberalism. But what it has done instead is be the pyschological underpinning of liberalism’s motivation (through its desire to emasculate everyone) –_and fought all its wars for it, for over a century_.” — FP
Please re-read my reply to your latest (immediately above).
“A given thing is not what you want to believe it is or what it says it is as ink on paper. A thing is what it actually is in reality. Christianty –just like capitalism– is the backbone root of feminist ascendency –”proof is in the pudding”:
Feminism is unique to the christian capitalist world. Coincidence? Or proof in the pudding?” — FP
Please re-read my reply to your latest (immediately above).
RE: Proverbs 31
>Proverbs 31….” — FP
“Is that the one where ‘wimmin should not cutteth their hair shorteth?’” — FP
You didn’t do your reading assignment….that’s pretty obvious. And it reinforces my first item (above) that you don’t know squadoo.
“Doesn’t do anything.” — FP
“I like the one where ‘the enemy babies are smasheth upon the rocks’.” — FP
Really? Show me that in Book/Chapter/Verse….mind you now. New Testament.
“Eugenics is good; ‘turn the other cheek’ is bad. You teach people how to treat you. Old testament is for building cultures; the new testament is for under-minning them. (The new testament vibe –and the lingering effects of the early monk’s desire to geld the barbarians– is preventing us from instituting the ‘wimmin hair style’ policies of proverbs.)” — FP
“Know your enemy… indeed.” — FP
Like I sayth (above), buckie. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
“What I meant by the comment “…[american /christians] are anti rational (not just ir-rational)” was amercians have
demonstrated that they are anti intellectual, historically (especially when it comes to the cause and effect epiphannies of
the naturalist materialist “darwin” thing). This is preventing them from solving problems because they don’t properly diagnose them; and it is likewise preventing them from processing the domino effects of the things they do allow, advocate, fight for and create.” — FP
Oh. Anti-American as well as anti-intellectual? After all, it would have been a simple think for you to read my suggestion. But you chose not to. And in so [not]doing you demonstrate that you’re ‘projecting’ about Christians, as well as Americans, being ‘anti-intellectual’.
An ‘intellectual’ AND ‘liberal’ would have read the material before replying.
You obviously didn’t.
Nuff said….
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[There is nothing to which men will not do in order to avoid having to actually THINK.]
