>Chuck Pelto:
TO: FP
RE: Hard-Bitten Females
“Christians/ american conservatives don’t think their beliefs thru, because they are anti rational [not just ir-rational].” —
FP
May I suggest a reading?
Try the latter part of Proverbs 31….to understand the way Christians see REAL women.
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[Know your enemy…..– Sun Tzu, The Art of War]
>
———-
I do know my enemy.
By “real christians” you really mean cults from the outback.
“Real christianity’s” belief regarding females (or anything else) is a manifestation of the rustic pyschological effect that occured during the colonial occupation of the continent.
The mainstream of christianity is christianity and it is liberal at its psychological root and it always has been. From its inception through its entire history in Europe, it is a cult of infantiles and slave dolts getting rid of the better men; this ultimately leads to “feminism”, the same way geting rid of the alpha male wolves leads to a she-wolf coup against the puppy males that are left over.
The fact so called “real christians” (the various neo-masculine cults of the rustic american out back) allowed themselves to
be so easily marginalized and demonized (and if we are to believe that they are the “real christians” then also “hijacked and
redefined”) and _conscripted_ as warriors against themselves is all I need to know about my enemies and my allies.
If you have a need to believe in the boogieman in the sky who looks out for you and is always on “your” side whatever your biologic compunction, then Islam is a much better way to go. It at its inception is a society creator, while christianty is a society destroyer (first Rome than the North Euro out back). Note though (and this is a problem): If Euro males did convert to Islam, I presume that they –and especially the north western types– being left over puppies, would warp islam into a chivalrous feminist religion.
Christianity has had plenty of time to put up a successful contest to liberalism. But what it has done instead is be the pyschological underpinning of liberalism’s motivation (through its desire to emasculate everyone) –_and fought all its wars for it, for over a century_.
A given thing is not what you want to believe it is or what it says it is as ink on paper. A thing is what it actually is in reality. Christianty –just like capitalism– is the backbone root of feminist ascendency –”proof is in the pudding”:
Feminism is unique to the christian capitalist world. Coincidence? Or proof in the pudding?
——
>Proverbs 31….
Is that the one where ‘wimmin should not cutteth their hair shorteth?’
Doesn’t do anything.
I like the one where ‘the enemy babies are smasheth upon the rocks’.
Eugenics is good; ‘turn the other cheek’ is bad. You teach people how to treat you. Old testament is for building cultures; the new testament is for under-minning them. (The new testament vibe –and the lingering effects of the early monk’s desire to geld the barbarians– is preventing us from instituting the ‘wimmin hair style’ policies of proverbs.)
Know your enemy… indeed.
———
What I meant by the comment “…[american /christians] are anti rational (not just ir-rational)” was amercians have
demonstrated that they are anti intellectual, historically (especially when it comes to the cause and effect epiphannies of
the naturalist materialist “darwin” thing). This is preventing them from solving problems because they don’t properly diagnose them; and it is likewise preventing them from processing the domino effects of the things they do allow, advocate, fight for and create.
