>someone said (again exposing the pernicious nature of salacious demagoguery, given the actual topic here):
“sexual availability at puberty”
———
Why shouldn’t wimmin be made to remain sexually available?
Men putting endless barriers around females (as their male reproductive strategy for marginalizing other males) is why we have the ambition, greed, political problems(triangulation: immigration, feminism etc) and the pyschological/pathology, chaotic economic and overall ‘growth’/environmental problems we do in western culture.
Islamics and Polynesians and etc indolent cultures are non growth based –ie non enviromentally destructive and non chaotic/ non pathologic– specifically because the males are content…
…given the “sexual availability” of their females.
=====
It is ironic that the west’s sexual revolution’s and “free love” lead to the price of sex going through the roof (thereby exacerbating male competition to generate more for themselves –at other’s expenses– so they can buy some acceptance and fidelity from a creature so en-pedalsteled that she rarely offers any.)
======
People in western culture are like children that don’t understand what they really advocate. It’s just tanturm and endless political triangulations/ realignments.
——
I find it fascinating that liberals have no problem advocating “redistribution of wealth” but are blind to the real wealth –that biologically underpins and motivates all the other kinds of competition/ wealth aquiring.
Redistrubte the real wealth of the parasite elites…
“control the females”.
——
“People in western culture are like children that don’t understand what they really advocate”…
——-
I know it’s hopeless, ’cause you are all dunce congenitally. But my well placed contempt for mankind is such that I push post anyway…
