A Comment About

Ethnic Cleansing in Russia

April 6, 2008 - 12:00 am - by Kim Zigfeld
FP
2008-04-08 17:09:02

It’s like you didn’t even read what I said above.

Try it again…


Until there are _real_ solutions to “balkinization” (part of the many faceted “human condition”, which is a poetic human

conceit really meaning the ignored though persistent natural reality of the obstinate cosmos), there is no reason for a breed
to allow/advocate its own marginalization in the grand darwinist scheme of things.

Given the cold hard facts of reality –especially as regards the effortless cruelty of children and females– if one becomes
the ugly duckling in his _own home pond_ he’s done…
—-
—-
Where’s that renowend verbal acuity sweety. It’s like you didn’t even read what I said.

Just saying you despise racism isn’t good enough. It doesn’t change anything. The majority will still become the minority and then will be marginalized by “racism” in their own homeland if they don’t fight back against migrating minorities. America has already overtly demonstratred this very nicely thankyou (first with the Indians and now with the white males).

I could just as easily say “I despise migration” (which has always led to “reverse rascim”). And I could continue easily by saying “It is _immoral_ to migrate to someone else’s homeland, ultimately stealing spoils from the host culture’s crib and blood, sweat and tears legacy.

Just using a political trick of denouncing the host culture’s reflex of self survival as immoral and something to be despised doesn’t address a single thing; it is simply a political trick (witting or otherwise) to lull the host population’s sheep into compliance.

Just saying you despise ‘racism’ [read you despise the success of some majority of host citizens somewhere who aren't letting your favorites reap spoils] doesn’t change anything deep.

As far as you asking me to prove I’m loyal to your cause, where are your links demonstrating that you openly despise ‘migrant power prejudiciously marginalizing host weakness’ [read: "racism"] when that marginalizing of host weakness benefits your interests? Any links where you “openly criticize” what Israel (a newly arrived migrant nation) does to the vestigial host culture there?… hmmm?

——-
Oh and civil ordinances about having to ask to move to over populated Moscow is not “racism”. It is a verbal trick you’re using in the story to get allies. Same with the ‘Estonia issue’ (which is political border stuff from recent baltic history not racism per se).

——-
I state again from my first post here:

“The american “right” is so littered with ‘cross purposes’ agendas, through hijacking, it is useless as a “right”. It is actually dangerous to any vestigial right.”