You may indeed be right that the murder of Dr. Tiller received more media attention. You certainly didn’t come anywhere close to proving it, or even making it a plausible idea. This paragraph gave it away:
Last month Scott Roeder murdered the abortionist “doctor” George Tiller, who referred to babies slipping out of the womb alive during killing procedures as “sloppy medicine” and admitted performing abortions up to the day before the baby’s delivery date.
And even there…did he do those things? I suppose we only have your word for it. You wouldn’t lie to us, of course.
And suppose there was more attention to the murder of Tiller over those soldiers. WHat does it mean? I mean, besides it fitting nicely into your pre-existing prejudices, what does it mean? Is it possible, its simply a more sensational story? The man was a doctor, he was murdered in a church, the murderer had a troubled history. What’s more the abortion ISSUE is contentious on both sides–do you think its only the pro=abortion contingent who made this a big story?
You’re obviously out of your element here. You couldn’t reason your way out of a wet paper bag.
