#86 — What was I saying earlier about the response of ‘atheists’ when presented with the idea that some people think differently from them?
Spin, mensa boy, spin. By my accurately pointing out that you believe in talking snakes and magic trees, you now want to claim you’re being attacked. How so? Poor persecuted man. The scrotal torsion alone from that sort of spin could sterilise an elephant.
Do you now deny you believe in talking snakes, or do you simply find my characterisation of a talking snake (by calling it, ummmm, a talking snake) hurtful to your sensitive nature? Go ahead; call me names, Pelto. Call me an atheist, or gay, or both. It’s what you do. You know you want to. It’s all you got.
#102 — If you really wanted to be mean…[snip]
Satire only works when it’s on target and funny. Your bit was neither. Talking snakes, on the other hand, are quite amusing.
#103 — I like living my life with a little taste of heaven.
And I think that’s great if that works for you. It works for hundreds of millions. My only point with the accurate summary of christian belief is that believing in talking snakes etc. doesn’t automatically hand said believer the moral high ground.
#95 — God Alston, there are atheists, like the estimable Nat Hendoff, for instance, who can clearly see that abortion is wrong and who make the case on non-theological grounds.
In your pointy-headed tunnel vision world, anyone who fails to believe in talking snakes is an atheist. Noted. You must be a mensa member as well.
