From another PJM article about Sotomayor, I find this. In opposing the Alito nomination Senator Obama is quoted as having said that those on the Court should address the question of “. . . whether a general right of privacy encompasses a more specific right of women to control their reproductive decisions.” What I am not getting is if human beings have a God-given right of privacy granted by their Creator, who created them all in a state of equality, why then doesn’t the equally-created child, in partially being born, have an equal right of privacy as codified, penumbra-like, in our Bill of Rights? If we can agree that she obviously does then this should effectively bar anyone from piercing her skull and sucking her brains out for financial purposes. The Right of Privacy for this reason does not resolve the question of abortion — only the question of the humanity of the child can effectively resolve this issue. If we look at the honesty of ante-bellum slave owners or of the Nazis or of the anti-capitalist Bosheviks in impartially resolving the question of the humanity of their intended victims, then we know the human brain, affected as it constantly is with ulterior motives, cannot be trusted to resolve this issue, whether it is the brain of an average human being walking around, or the brain of a trained Supreme Court justice with no legislative power. Thus we see that Jefferson was right in enunciating the required default position: We are all created, not born, equal, and any other more restrictive argument is automatically suspect since no one says that, hey, a baby is subhuman so let’s kill her. No. The brain works the other way. We actually say “I hate Jews or I want to own slaves, or this baby is an imposition so I want to get rid of them or exploit them, and it would certainly serve my interests if I could do that, so they must be sub-human. The Right of privacy thus means that no one with human DNA is sub-human so you can’t kill anyone, unless they’re trying to kill you. I can’t figure out any other logical answer from the founding religious principles of our Nation.
- Home
- Columnists
- J. Christian Adams
Rule of Law - Ed Driscoll
EdDriscoll.com - Richard Fernandez
Belmont Club - Stephen Green
Vodkapundit - Victor Davis Hanson
Works and Days - Roger Kimball
Roger’s Rules - Andrew Klavan
Klavan on Culture - Michael Ledeen
Faster, Please! - Andrew McCarthy
Ordered Liberty - Ron Radosh
Ron Radosh - Claudia Rosett
The Rosett Report - Barry Rubin
Rubin Reports - Roger L. Simon
Roger L. Simon - Dr. Helen Smith
Dr. Helen - Spengler
David P. Goldman - Zombie
Zombie - Belladonna Rogers
Belladonna Rogers - Janine Turner
Janine Turner
- J. Christian Adams
- PJ Tatler
- PJ Lifestyle
- Instapundit
- PJTV
- PJ Institute
G. Clarke
2009-06-03 20:41:44
MOST POPULAR
- 10 Reasons You Should Skip Traditional Publishers and Self-Publish Ebooks Instead
by Robert Bidinotto - This Ain't No Polish Joke
by Stephen Green - Changing Minds in Crunch Time
by Roger L Simon - The Bernie Madoff of Information
by Andrew Klavan - CNN Contributor Victim of 'SWATting' Incident
by Ed Driscoll - Lessons from Europe's Winners and Losers
by David P. Goldman - Climate Change: Why Do the Facts Fail to Convince?
by Tom Harris - Madness in High Places
by Michael Ledeen - 5 Great Pieces Of R-Rated Life Advice from the Movies
by John Hawkins - Obama Reframes His Frugal Spending Claim
by Tom Blumer
THE EDITORS @ PJM
- J. Christian AdamsLegal Editor
- Ed DriscollSan Jose
- Stephen GreenDenver
- Aaron HanscomLos Angeles
- Bridget JohnsonWashington D.C.
- Rick MoranChicago
- Bryan PrestonAustin
- Glenn Harlan ReynoldsTennessee
- Barry RubinMiddle East
- Roger L SimonHollywood
- David SteinbergNew York
- Dave SwindleLos Angeles
Home | About Us | Media | Advertising | Tips For PJM | Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us
Copyright © 2005-2012 PJ Media All Rights Reserved. v1.27.2




