As a recent Harvard graduate I need to point out some context that is missing from this article.
The gym affected QRAC is the most obscure on at Harvard, practically off-campus, and in my four years there, I literally didn’t know anyone who used it for anything other than team sports practice. THe main gym, the Mac, is vastly more popular and also vastly more conviently located for 80% of the dorms. And vastly better-equipped.
So I think the suggestion that is a title IX violation is ill-informed, since there is plenty of access to facilities elsewhere on campus at all times. It also doesn’t seem any different to me than reserving some of the toasters in the Harvard dining hall for kosher-only use (which also caused some campus controversy, which i why I bring it up.)
