“Where is the money coming from?” Quantum Economics requires you to think of money as a positive charged electron that becomes usable when it is able to “capture” and circle the large mass nucleus of wealth created with its expenditure — an atomic model of the economy where money and wealth are not identical, but reciprocal atomic particles, each carrying an opposite, matching electrical charge. These charges then allow them to flow in opposite attracting “currents” through the economy. (“Currency” — get it. The proof that immortal money is oppositely charged from its matching consumable wealth is found in Gresham’s law, where money is treated in a way opposite to market wealth).
So, with this model the way to create new money is easy to enunciate, and easy to understand if not to do. Just require that all new money be used (by government in particular) to create and manufacture new market wealth worth more in the market than the cost to produce it. The measure of increase in value by the effort (profit) is the measure of the amount of new money that is being created by the effort. This is because all money in circulation does not have an inherent value — it only has a derivative value, derived from the inherent value of the market wealth that it is exchanged for. Free give aways from the government don’t count since don’t go into the market and they can’t render value to any money in circulation by attracting and absorbing it in exchange.
Increase profit, and you increase money. Money is congealed profit. This in a nutshell is why captitalism, the pursuit of profit, works, making us all richer as measured by the growth of money, the new presence of which allows for more creativity and production of usable, and cheaper, wealth. It is also why socialism, organized governmental consumption which adds nothing to the market and just uses up the money capitalism created, is doomed to the same starvation, cannabilism, work camps, gulags, societal breakdown and ultimate war and disease that we saw with Lenin in 1919-1921 and with Stalin ten years later and with Mao in the mid-50′s (and with Pol Pot, and Cesaescu, and Castro, and Kim Jung-Il, etc.). Not an accident folks. Which side of history does Obama really want to fall on?
(Just think if government decided to compete with the monopolists and oligopolists by creating a profit with its newly printed money instead of consuming it, we would not have to pay taxes and we’d all be alot richer by that fact alone. Dream on, but that’s your answer — Quantum Economics). There is no other.
