ah..sheesh.”How could you miss the point in #19 . . . that you folks are an endless and string of hysterical paranoia”
i guess in your foggy recesses valid concerns of our constitutional rights being taken away could be considered “hysterical paranoia”
“moving from one topic of aggrieved victimhood to the next.”
not alot of “victimhood” being practiced around here,we leave that to the meek and disarmed.
“Empathy” was proof, proof I tell you, that Obama was not interested in a judge who honors the Constitution, then OOPS! Alito had said the same thing, so empathy disappears from the discussion,”
sotomayor is clearly an ‘activist’ judge,no way to spin it….you did make an admirable effort though.
what we want:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_constructionism
what she embodies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism
= no worky.
more stale talking points:
“just like Obama’s choice of spicy mustard at the burger shop, which Hannity and Ingraham spent two days whining about.”
don’t these two characters have hours of airtime a day to fill up,how many people listening do you think actually care about mustard?
try tuning in to mark levin….then you will be much more up to date on the current mindset of the informed right wing nutter.
you can thank me later.
