Dave
2008-03-20 06:30:51
Prager is only attempting to explain, partially as he admits, the reason for the two to one ratio. He allows in advance for all the things you end up criticising him over.
Your criticism is therefore overwrought, inappropriate and somewhat defensive.
Prager is a wise man. He is not reflexively anti-feminist as you would have us believe. He is not blinded by his maleness, nor prejudiced against women or the women’s movement.
He is also not so weak as to shy away from truth for fear of offending. And clearly he has offended you.
His analysis is accurate and your criticism is badly aimed and ineffective.
