Also, that approval rating isn’t very different from any other President’s 100 day mark. All of the ratings are within the margin of error of each other. As a predictor of future performance, it is worthless. Here is a snippet from an article on that topic;
“The bar is 65. That’s the average 100-day approval rating for the ten presidents between 1953 and 2009. Obama will likely be narrowly underachieving when the milestone comes to pass, perhaps earning 63 percent. That would place Obama between Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter in the public’s view.”
From here;
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/23/obama_nears_100_average_approval__ultra-polarizing___96141.html
Notice that the Usurper is a very polarizing figure. Most of that is because he IS NOT a natural born American citizen and as such only meets two of the three criteria need to be a legitimate President. If he had given permission to allow public access to his birth certificate instead of trying to pass off a forgery, then he would have the grudging support of the right. Only the Usurper couldn’t give that permission because THERE IS NO BIRTH CERTIFICATE. As all the witnesses say, he was born in Kenya.
The problem with tea leaves is you see what you want in them. Changing your pipe contents just makes the colors brighter. You want to see America’s first socialist dictator be successful. So you think that the first 100 days poll means something beyond the Usurper being almost middle of the pack. I see that he ranks between Nixon and Carter and we know how they turned out. Or at least I do, I’m not so sure about you.
