PJ Media

I wonder if the issue isn’t really all just about money.
men have it. have the ability to make more of it, faster. the ratio of single or married women to that of single or married men based on percent of millions earned is quite disparate.

that said, and according to Ruth, a woman who is attractive(since intelligence means nothing in the high-pay escorting business apparently) can only produce that kind of money in the window of 18-25, since after that, her value goes down.

Unattractive young women, on the other hand, who have to depend on their brains have a longer “shelf” life in the fortune building world, yet, raising a man’s children takes her out of the game consistantly, while her male counter-part continues to rise un-disturbed, unless of course he divorces his wife and assets are shared.

Being unattractive may also stem her rise to the top as most corps are run by men who probably exhibit a preference to nice-looking women as co-workers.

(All guessing here as well as trying to make some sense of the dynamic)

there really is an extreme inbalance of fortune equality. the stakes are high against both plain single women and previously successful women now taking time out to raise a man’s children. I think there will be until there is fortune equality. for instance equal percentage of fortune 500 women to men. until then, women have a long way to go to get out of the prostitution business.

the playing field is still far from equal.

nonetheless Ruth, good article.