The main difference between Clinton and Obama is one of character. Any one paying attention can see that Senator Clinton is diverting attention from her own shortcomings by projecting them on to Senator Obama
On NAFTA
While blaming Obama, her own campaign asked asked Canada to take her anti-NAFTA crticism with “a grain of salt” http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g9rwO9WjyXz5a-SfrETivAeTEnnw
Meanwhile, Obama’s only fault on NAFTA has been to hire smart economists like Goulsbee who speak their own mind
On Corruption,
While digging up a fifteen year old, thoroughly vetted relationship with Tony Rezko, both Clintons are concealing their own indictment in the largest election law fraud is US history
http://youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&feature=related
On Experience
While comparing her 35 years to one Obama speech, Hillary is concealing the lack of ANY substantive accomplishments
- Legislative
http://barackobama.meetup.com/254/boards/thread/4201317
- Foreign experience
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0308/Clintons_experience.html
Meanwhile, Obama passed healthcare reform and hundreds of other bills in Illinois
http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2007/07/29/us/politics/20070730_OBAMA_GRAPHIC.html
Whatever experience the Clinton’s bring can best be used under the transparent leadership of an Obama presidency, not as a family dynasty.
