#116 one of my own
“I’M WITH LYNN! AND WHILE WE’RE AT IT, LET’S AMEND THE CONSTITUTION TO DEFINE IGNORANT”
HEY! I DON’T KNOW ABOUT THAT one of my own PLEASE EXCUSE MY ‘IGNORANCE’ nudge, nudge BUT AS FAR AS I KNOW THE WORD IGNORANT IS DEFINED JUST AS THE WORD MARRIED IS DEFINED.
NOW SINCE THE COURTS SEEM TO DESIRE THAT IT BE RE-DEFINED (MARRIAGE) TO INCLUDE OTHER COUPLINGS IT SEEMS THAT THE CONSTITUTION COULD BE AMENDED TO STOP THE COURTS FROM REDEFINING WORDS AT THE WHIM OF GROUPS WHO DON’T LIKE THE DEFINITION OF A WORD, SO GO THROUGH THE COURTS TO CHANGE IT.
WAIT A MINUTE! ISN’T TYPING IN ALL CAPS CONSIDERED SHOUTING AND MANY CONSIDER IT ignorant?
But that’s okay, you probably are not sure what the word IGNORANT means since you need an amendment to DEFINE it. Perhaps the case could be taken up by the judicial branch especially if you or someone else doesn’t like the meaning and want to change it.
BYE! BYE!
Oh sorry! There I go being ignorant.
Bye! Bye!
