A Comment About

Ask Dr. Helen: Is Male Bashing Curable?

February 21, 2008 - 1:10 am
NikFromNYC
2008-02-21 11:44:06

Is Phyllis Chesler curable? I’ve refreshed this page five times. She each time appears on the right, with her picture, on this very page.

Is her obesity curable? Yes! Just read the book you, Instawife and Instahusband recommended: ‘Good Calories/Bad Calories’ along with the book Omega-RX Zone (about fish oil).

Is her man-hatred curable? Am I assuming man-hatred from a founding mother of feminism? Let’s do some research. Wow. She became a feminist because she moved to…WOW…Afghanistan! Lately she’s been an activist against anti-semitism. I’m starting to like her. Uh, oh: her *early* books toe the man-hating party line, but her latest interviews are more Libertarian, even though she doesn’t admit that her early work was classic stereotyping of all men, based on the men in…Afghanistan. And she now used the term “third-wave feminism” which I assume has stopped stereotyping all men as Taliban thugs. I wonder what she now thinks of the toppling of the Taliban, which now means girls can legally (i.e. not under threat of death) learn to read there, for the first time in decades?

***

Time to read all the comments…be back in an hour…

***

First I must wonder why there is little discussion at high policy level of Affirmative Action for men, since women now represent 2/3 of college graduates, assuming that recent statistic isn’t some urban myth?

“The next step is, “Mom, you are an abuser. Until you learn some self-control, I cannot be around you except once in a while for perfunctory family holidays. If I am not around as much as you would like, you have chosen to keep me away with your sexist abusive attitude towards me.”

OMG that’s *so* wonderfully wicked that only a woman (or a member of the male-empowerment “community of pickup artists”) would even dare *think* of it. THANK YOU!!! I don’t think but 50% of males or females in our culture know what ‘perfunctory’ means though, nor would recall it even if they did, when Mom starts ragging on them. Translation thus? “Mom, just f*ck off and I mean that’s a threat. Yell at me for being a guy again. See what happens. SHUT UP, B*TCH. Just shut the h*ll up. I will not visit a man hating zombie, got it? I asked you a question. Do you UNDERSTAND?” Now is the hard part, because, no, she will *not* understand it. She will tie knots, backtrack, etc. etc. etc. So? Next man-bashing session. Get up and leave. Drive away. Only non-emotional actions work for behaviorial modification of wife or mothers. Consider that she is *trying* to get a rise out of you, *trying* to provoke and upset you, since you are ironically too WIMPY of a man for her, as a woman, to respect! It does not mean you have to become a fist-weilding pimp, just a person who LEAVES, with no emotion (many women being emotion junkies), when you are disrespected or insulted as a person.

Another thing I hesitate to say, is that some people, men and women alike are masochists, but it’s kind of hard to find a sadistic soul mate, so they use a honeymoon period to pull a person in, then start to mindf*ck them into being abusive towards them. This happened to me. I felt awful. I was the bad guy. Then I read several dozen books on passive-aggression and personality disorders. I thought it would help, but when an emotional vampire is exposed to light, they tend to move on instead of change, so instead of fixing things, you lose the love of your life, or worse, they switch back to honeymoon stage for several weeks or months to keep hold of you. Beware lads.

Finally though, one thing *not* addressed by this article is that men are not stupid. We have FIGURED out that most men are pussywhipped from birth to schooling to college to the workplace. So to stand out, we merely need to be UTTERLY immune to and flippantly intolerant of man-hatred culture, and guess what? Women become HIGHLY attracted to us, almost *any* woman notices a man who is unapologetically MASCULINE, as in outspoken in public, or who shows obvious sexual interest in women akin to his testosteronal hyper-interest in an hourglass-shaped parked Ferrari. It’s more a matter of disbelief than anything else. We grab a girlfriendless friend, and say “watch this” and walk right up, put our arm around a girl in a group, surrounded by “you’re so cute” guys, and tell her she should come talk to us. And she *does*!!! The eyes of our friend pop out. But then he rationalizes it as something he cannot do or have, so you have to trick him into doing it himself, so his protective (“don’t be a man!!!!”) subconscious changes its tune.

O.K. having read the comments, indeed another well known scientific fact presents itself. Male humans feel sexual disgust very rarely, as in open puss-oozing sores and “crack whore” body language. But females turn on a dime and can feel sexual (and thus personal) DISGUST with men for even minor reasons. Why? Duh. They are programmed to expect to get PREGNANT if they warm up to a wimpy guy with “beat on” body language. There are two major tests that women ALWAYS apply. One is to ignore you at first, to test for actual (not just sexual interest). Two is to misbehave in some way to TEST you for how you deal with misbehavior. Why? That’s how you will be as a father. If you are too accepting of misbehavior, you will not make a good father. If you get SUPER upset, again, you’d suck as a father.

The other reason for this “odd fickleness” of women is that once they have sex with you, their body releases hormones that make her bond with you, so that instead of grabbing for straw man reasons to not like you, suddenly they are rationalizing why you are such a great guy. Here is the refrain of ugly feminsts everywhere: “Men suck! Pigs! Animals!” (= he didn’t “call back”). Solution? Look good in the morning. Do not tie your long hair up like his grandmother does. Do not stink. Do not call yourself a “slut” outloud, over and over and over again, as if you regret following natural urges. Especially, do not, over breakfast, congradulate the man for being a feminist who should read the SCUM (“Society to Cut Up Men”) by the gal who shot Andy Warhol. I am merely describing my last online date, as in last one, ever.

Conspiracy Theory: The MSM (Main Stream Media) and it’s “luxury good” income via advertising sources, want men and women both to feel inadequate. So a man isn’t a man unless he showers a girl with diamonds and pearls, and a woman isn’t sexy unless she displays diamonds and pearls (and a male-like six-pack stomach).

Another problem is that men have forgotten how to give women orgasms. I mean deep ones. It’s via PASSION, your passion, your UNIQUE attraction for her. I know, I know, we all want harems, but this is just so obvious: love the one you’re with! And learn that their sex organ is actually over an inch away from your center of fun.

A few posters mentioned Ayn Rand. She had very high testosterone. Her books involved *rape* as their romantic climaxes. Bit much? But taken as a metaphor, it makes perfect sense. Women, like broken records exclaim without reservation that they “want a man who will ‘sweep them off their feet’”. Uh, if that’s not a man on a horse, killing all the males in the village and collecting her as “booty” then I don’t know what else is. A long walk on the beach? In chains!