44. Steve P.:
Samizdat: “The fact that his intelligence, which was consistent with other nation’s assessments, turned out to be wrong does not amount to a lie.”
Nice try, but the truth is apparent to anyone who has paid attention that Bush was aggressively pushing for war and would only accept intelligence that supported his case, even when it came from dubious sources like “Curveball.” And even though there was plenty of contrary evidence and sources, he ignored them. Had he waited a couple of months, like some rational folks were suggesting, we would have found out that Saddam had no WMDs or operational connections to Al Qaeda. And thousands of American soldiers and Iraqis might still be alive.
———————-
Why is it Steve P. that every single time a liberal types in “Bush!…War!” they, at the same time, fail to mention the well documented text/video of their own democratic leadership making the same exact claims about Saddam Hussein and WMD’s? Why is that, Steve?
Why were the democrats on the hill “for the war” Steve, before they were against it? Can you answer that, Steve?
