Phil Doyle says
In nature form doesn’t follow function. Gorillas have Gigantic incisor and canine teeth. They eat veggies and bugs. Chimps have flattened molars and under-exaggerated canines, they eat meat and even other chimps. Intestine length, tooth structure, etc. are just ways for evolutionary biologists to make their field of work legitimate.
And your point is? Ovresized canines in gorilla (like in mandrills) are related to fighting and defence not nutrition. For chimps they are not primarly carnivorous and even if they were, big canines are only useful when animal uses them for killing.
Now since apparetly you have answered my post about intestine lenths and humans not being vegetarians tell me what is the secundary function (the one justifying its existence) of our comparatively short intestines and tell me before cooking was invented how humans could have survived on a vegetarian diet with these short intestines to digest it.
