Mrs Marie Claude
You are really incredible. Ever trying to divert attention. I was telling that the North Africans (untermenschen in De Gaulle’s mind) should have not been fighting the Bulge battle and doing the dying when there were so many French (the real ones, the herrensvolk) who should have been catching up on that work they dropped in 1940. And you come saying that they were there because of Eisenhower. That was not the point. The point was that those North Africabns had been French enough to fight and die for saving Strasburg then they were FRENCH. Period. Far more French than any Vychist. That has ever been a cornerstone of western civilization since Sparta granted citizenship to the helots who had fought for her.
Also you told that France was broke and when I pointed at contemporary movies you laughed at me. You shouldn’t have. You can learn a lot from movies if you look at the crowd. Not at the actors (these are ever beautiful people), not at the extras but at the crowd. For instance when you look at the people far away from the camera in the Berkeley shots in “The Graduate” you notice that Americans weren’t fat in the sixties. And when you look at what is far away from the camera (ie beond the extras) you don’t see derelict buildings or people in shabby clothes and looking hungry.
But even if France was far worse off than it was it was her duty to take those who had fought for it,, specially given the savage and sadistic nature of the FLN thugs. And in case you had no room for them (two hundred thousand people on a population of fourty millions) just shoot or deport a few thousands vichysts and communists (who in addition of their 1940 betrayal had been helping the FLN and in some occasions setting bombs who killed French) and hey presto: There is room now.
What I also find utterly apalling is your complete lack of morality. Now I could understand that you justified atrocities when like for the man in the Russian tale who throws his son to the wolves, France’s existence was at stake. But it wasn’t at stake at Lepanto (look at the painting “Les Massacres de Scio” and multiply by one thousnad), it wasn’t at stake at the second siege of Vienna, it wasn’t at stake for the harkis just slightly tightening its belt and tens of thousands dies in the most horrible ways, it wasn’t at stake for the Six days War (genocide had Israel lost), it wasn’t at stake when you tried hard to have Saddam own nukes), it wasn’t at stake for Rwanda (just Total’s balance sheet) when you supported a government you klnew too weel was pfreparingf for genocide, later covered the retreat of the Interamwe and ended rearmeing them. Nothing of this is ever wrong to you.
