A Comment About

Twelve Ways Obama Could Lose

February 1, 2012 - 12:00 am - by Patrick Reddy
proreason
2012-02-01 11:10:36

One could argue that obama won in 2008 because Bush didn’t intervene and force a soft landing for the bad loans. Bush did have a $300M stimulus that increased GDP in Q2 2008 because it was a complete tax rebate, but he never did anything about the housing crisis, and it exploded in the fall (probably because Soros and co pricked the bubble by taking Lehman Bros down and by the Money Market run the week after Lehman fell).

But here is the difference for 2012; the marxists won’t hesitate for a second to do whatever is necessary to get little lenin reelected. They may make a mistake, but they won’t fail for lack of effort.

And like 2008, 95% of the governments in the world will cooperate with obama or be working for him on their own. There absolutely won’t be a market crash this year, and if a shoot-em-up starts, it absolutely will be one that works in bams’s favor. Iran ain’t gonna be taking no hostages this year. Bank on it. How come we don’t hear about that American hostage in Egypt, btw. Shouldn’t there be a tv show dedicated to that by now. It’s almost like nobody cares. Don’t be surprised, though, if there isn’t a very dramatic rescue in the near future. The poor boy may have to suffer until October, but if I was him, I wouldn’t be overly worried. Spike will send the Seals in at an opportune moment.

Nobody, not even the marxists, can control everything, but their willingness to try gives them a massive edge that few people are talking about.