James Angle
2009-03-23 10:02:05
I find it interesting that they set the limit at $250,000. Bill Clinton set that level for his 10% tax surcharge for the rich back in 1992. Using that same number would imply that the cost of living has not increased in 16 years. Another thing is the last time we taxed income at 90% or more it applied to income over $400,000 and that ended in 1963. So I guess that it takes less money to be rich in 2009 than it did in 1963. Does any one else think there is something wrong here?
