A Comment About

The Newspaper Slump: Blaming the Bloggers

March 19, 2009 - 12:35 am - by Pam Meister
Marina
2009-03-21 00:46:24

Kathleen Parker is not a token conservative, she’s a MANCHURIAN LIBERAL.

Remember all this Gramsci-Alinsky-etc. stuff about marching through the institutions? Some masked libs had become justices, another college professors, yet another media patriarchs or Hollywood brainwashers. And one small but significant group has become “conservative activists”. They actually have been libs all their lifes, but pretended to be conservative, just to come out at the right moment (I strongly suspect Colin Powel was one of them: he once said he wanted to candidate for president, but when asked about the party, he suddenly fell silent). Andrew Sullivan is definitely such a scum. He’s written his f— book, OMG, “Conservative Soul: How we lost it and how to get it back” or something like this. What a defender of conservatism! And then it comes: Obama vs. Sarah. And this b… trashes the most conservative candidate in order to promote the most liberal one. Michelle Malkin called him “political chameleon” a couple of years ago. I would say: MANCHURIAN LIBERAL.

Many RINOs are such people. Not all of them, but really many. Remember, how many high-ranked reps tried to hurt Bush during his presidency (or at least didn’t prevent him from being hurt by the libs: ABC-doctored interview e.g. – and shocked O’Reily: “President’s people KNEW that ABC does such things! WHY did they let him go there?” – That what I would like to know too…)? And when I think what those “conservatives” piranhas had done to Sarah, I just lose any doubts.

And look at the career of Mrs. Parker: she pretends to be conservative, but makes her money at the liberal MSM. Liberals had made her to what she is now. Liberals promoted her and made her a star. I doubt she had any chance on the conservative radio or on the FNC. She always has been the product of the left. I can imagine Soros had opened a bank account for her many years ago, somewhere in Switzerland perhaps? UBS? (That would be sweet.)

Anyway, she’s not a conservative, not even a “conservative”, she’s a very cynical liberal b…tch. She protects the liberal MSM against relatively independent internet, almost the only place where conservatives can say a word. She hates conservative blogs and feels sorry for the MSM losing their “authoritaaah”. Why won’t we stop call her and people like her conservatives? There are many sweet names for them…

In brief: THESE PEOPLE DO NOT BETRAY CONSERVATISM, THEY ARE LOYAL TO LIBERALISM.