“How are the tactics of the Left and Romney any different?”
[1] Newt pulled the same stunt in NH – it’s called politics.
“Moreover, the Ruling Class Republicans for the last 15 years have only set the table for obama”
[2] I agree with you there, but both Newt and Santorum also belong to that group. Romney has never held office in Washington, which is a plus in my book.
“Lots and lots of Ruling Class rhetoric. Other than taxes, which, surpise, put billion in their own pockets, what did they do?”
[3] Now YOU sound like leftist.
“So why do you think for a second Romney is going to be any different? Because he says so? Unfortunately, the problem with what he says is that he has turned out to be a bald-faced liar. Not as natural a liar as obama, but certainly a world-class bald-faced liar.”
[4] Yes he lies. All politicians do (except Ron Paul, who I believe to be an honest and principled man). Come down off the big rock candy mountain and face the real world.
“People should think seriously whether they should invest their hopes in a man whose ACTIONS demonstrate only one thing…he will do anything to win.”
[5] See 1
“Explain why the rhetoric of a man who hasn’t done a single conservative thing in his life, backed by a group of people who have been abettors of the leftist revolution are any better than the leftists themselves. I’m listening.”
[6] If you think Romney is like Saul Alinsky and his ilk – people who want to tear the fabric of our society and replace it with some utopian fascist state, then why am I even bothering to try and reason with you? Sorry, but that’s just plain stupid.
“Florida and the vile scheming of the conservative pravda have been an eye opener for me.”
[7] Oh boo hoo. So Coulter, Krauthammer, Imus, Drudge, etc are attacking your precious Mitt. Pravda?? Gimme a break.
Even though there’s more to your post it’s just meaningless gibberish. I stop here. Try to keep it to a few pithy remarks from now on.
