now then, if america’s been built from the ground up dependent on cheap oil, and if israel is dependent on america for its survival, and if america is threatened by peak oil, that means israel is threatened by peak oil.
since oil produces co2, and israel is threatened by sea level rise caused by global warming caused by co2 caused by burning oil, an effort must be made to curb co2 production by curbing use of oil, especially seeing as how china recently overtook the US as the world’s biggest producer of co2… curbing chinese use of energy means grabbing control of enough oil to forcibly restrict chinese access to oil… not to mention these PNAC dreams of global hegemony through control of energy, enforced, as a last resort, by nuke first strikes on russia and china.
…the sort of missile defenses that the United States might plausibly deploy would be valuable primarily in an offensive context, not a defensive one — as an adjunct to a U.S. first-strike capability, not as a standalone shield.
If the United States launched a nuclear attack against Russia (or China), the targeted country would be left with a tiny surviving arsenal — if any at all. At that point, even a relatively modest or inefficient missile-defense system might well be enough to protect against any retaliatory strikes, because the devastated enemy would have so few warheads and decoys left.
The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy From CFR Foreign Affairs, March/April 2006
the project is a mostly a response to threats posed to israel by peak oil and global warming.
it wasnt much of a problem getting the duty warmongers to sign on, because they never met a war they didnt like.
it wasnt much of a problem getting exxon to sign on, because the US taxpayer would be footing the bill for exxon’s oil acquisition costs, at a time when access to big fields is declining and exploration and production costs are skyrocketing… exxon tried to start building nuke electric plants, but they gave up after the chernobyl disaster…
many americans might be driving electric cars by now had exxon continued to develop nuke electricity… but that would have reduced israel’s importance in US foreign policy.
…not to mention the fact that this is the last chance for anyone to achieve global hegemony before the oil runs out.
if you’re a radical jew, you might even see this as the last chance to make the world safe for ashkenazi supremacism, which is apparently what bill kristol is talking about when he says he wants “benevolent global hegemony”… as he conveniently overlooks the fact that his benevolence has caused a million needless deaths so far, and the project’s just getting started.
israel is dependent on the US for protection. the US isnt dependent on israel for anything.
israel must be protected as it continues its land acquisition project to compensate for land that will likely be lost to sea level rise.
the looters, some of whom have no allegiance to anything or anyone but themselves, see peak oil coming, and as they loot america, they, too, are jeopardizing israel’s chances of survival by prematurely crippling israel’s american protector.
the israelis, who have self-selected for paranoia and psychopathy for a few generations now, seem unable to grasp the fact that their best chance for survival depends on cooperation with their neighbors.
but maybe it’s all gone so far that common sense no longer has a chance.
