Great, a hijacked link takes me to HuffPo. But as the author says “this kind of idiocy aside”, the lack of pragmatism, in fact, results from the dearth of ideological differences between the two major parties. They agree on 99.9999% of everything, thus the minor differences must be elevated to galactic proportions and they must be seen as disagreeing with one another. The arguments that author, and the rest of the moron media, make are utterly baseless in fact and are nothing but emotional screeds designed to render the listener incapable of rational thought. And who makes those arguments… is it the Tea Party member, the “hick in the sticks” or is it the moron media and the major party operatives? Who wants a real ideological debate to take place, who wants to focus on the serious issues of the day, and who will do anything and everything to prevent those discussions from taking place? Who wants the Presidential candidates to lay out a concrete platform, full of specifics, and who wants meaningless twaddle that means everything and nothing?
In summary, the lack of an honest debate stems from a one-party system masquerading as a two-party system. Those running the scam are deathly afraid that if we pause for a moment to consider the results and take a peek behind the curtain we won’t find any governance ongoing, instead we’ll find Organized Crime. And it’s clear that they’ll do anything at all to keep us away from the curtain.
