Mark Levin, who says he would vote for Santorum if the election was held today, has devoted about an hour of his show today to rebutting the outrageous lies about Gingrich’s Reagan credentials. I’ve never heard him more worked up. How significant is it when somebody who isn’t even supporting a candidate devotes an hour of airtime to defending him? A lot, I’d say.
Of course, Levin was in the RR administration, and is PUBLICALLY and OPENLY defending Newt, not writing snide asides and pulling little clips out of context from 20 year old clips. Or in other words, Levin is being honest…a alien concept to the RoveRomney fans.
Anybody can find the full context of the lies on the internet.
I posted one of them higher up in this thread.
Turns out that the McRomney defenders of “principles” are equivalent to obama when it comes to protecting their own tickets to the big house. The word I use to describe the tactic is “criminal”, because it’s a lot worse than lying. Now they have done it to Guiliani, Fred Thompson, McCain, Huckabee, Perry, Cain, Gingrich and who knows how many before them. Why, it’s almost like there is a pattern.
And they have a lot of apologists too.
This Terry Gain tool is a particularly breathless one.
But he is a nothing. What makes you wonder is what motivates people like Coulter, Steyn, CK and Wills. In CK’s case, of course, he was on Mondale’s campaign team, so you can see how conservative he is. The others? Who knows. Jealousy, money, hatred…it could be a lot of things.
