Gordon Chang wrote, “China has been conducting submarine operations and surveys in Japan’s EEZ without Japan’s consent (and over its repeated protests)…”
I got it! Chine sent its subs to Japan’s EEZ and the Japanese got pissed.
Thank you for telling us that at least Japan and China hold a common view towards foreign military presence in their own EEZ — it is NOT acceptable, which is exactly the opposite of what you just praised, and I quote “the majority view is that military operations are not prohibited in another country’s EEZ…”
Seriously, when you were in law school, did they ever teach you how to defend your claim? Not voluntarily providing facts against it I’d say at least.
Man you really give no hesitation before saying anything that could paint a bad image of China, even if that means slapping your own face in front of people. Please, have some principle could you?
Besides, EEZ was defined in Part V of the UNCLOS. How could you say, and I quote again, “The U.S. does in fact claim an EEZ. This has nothing to do with imperalism”, giving the fact that the UNCLOS has never been ratified by the US government? I guess it must have been based on another “majority view” of yours. Care to provide a counter example against it, something bad about China maybe?
