PJ Media

Indeed it has a clear purpose in cases like this where two conflicting accounts have already been presented, and anything he says can be used as “proof” that he is “lying”

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say there. The only case in which the two conflicting accounts can be used as proof that he was lying is if the two conflicting accounts are both his, and both sworn under oath.

It is most emphatically NOT the case that anything he says can be used as proof that he is lying, and your erection of that strawman suggests desperation on your part.