The presumption behind habeas corpus is that the petitioner is initially detained in accordance with amendments IV, V, VI, and VII. To not see that those four amendments paint just as bright a line as I and II abets “justice” to imprison citizens under the guise of yet another sham war.
Think that an unreasonable claim? Should “reasonable people” excuse progressives as “rhetorical” when calling banksters and the tea party terrorists? What about in the absurd Von Nothaus counterfeiting case, where “reasonable people” agreed with US Attorney Anne Tompkins, “Attempts to undermine the legitimate currency of this country are simply a unique form of domestic terrorism. While these forms of anti-government activities do not involve violence, they are every bit as insidious and represent a clear and present danger to the economic stability of this country”.
By Tompkins’ logic, being overweight attacks the health of the body politic and all NFL linemen are terrorists.
