#57
Very clever. First you subtract 20 million Limbaugh listeners from 110 million voters and pretend that it represents a meaningful number. Then you assert that all 90 million of those people think that Limbaugh is a “hypocritical imbecile”. You also claim that Limbaugh has no listeners among recent graduates.
When someone points out the fallacy of both of those arguments, you change them. The 90 million people who think Rush is an imbecile become 90 million people who could listen but don’t. Still an unprovable assertion, but less obviously fallacious. Since you really don’t know how many young voters listen to Rush, you guess at a number and then decide that it is irrelevant. When you say “For our purposes”, it really just means “I know I am right and I will ignore any data that contradicts my central thesis”.
