PJ Media

Other indications of the bias are the time frame selected — starting with 9/11/2001 — and the people they chose to examine. Why not also look at the statements of the previous president and other high-ranking politicians from the opposition party? They were saying the same things; were they also (as the “study” implies) lying to mislead the country into war?

If someone could get hold of the inevitable PR Newswire release that announced this “study”, I have no doubt that the press reports would turn out to be mostly re-writes of it, and that anyone quoted in those stories is either quoted in the press release, or is listed as a contact in it.