TomB
2008-01-17 16:49:59
Jeb, it isn’t a “criticism”, it is a disqualifying shortcoming that should have caused the authors, if the weren’t already operating on their own “preconceived notions”, to abandon that line of inquiry.
You cannot knowingly base a study on bad data merely by acknowledging that bad data. You must either find better data, or abandon the study.
I see that after reading the article you picked up on one of them
How in God’s name do you know that? Tell me what telepathic ability you have that allows you to know what I’m thinking.
You aren’t doing your argument any good by making silly assertions like that one.
