Personal religious beliefs should not matter. When religious beliefs directly influence policy decisions then questions can legitimately be raised. Obama has a 12 year legislative record. Is their any evidence that is personal religious beliefs have directly influenced his public policy decisions? If not the topic should be dropped.
Huckabee’s religious beliefs were placed front and center by him and most of the attacks on him have come from his primary opponents, not from the Left. If there is evidence that he has made public policy decisions based on religious faith rather than rationality then that is a reasonable discussion. If that evidence is absent the subject should be dropped.
Does Romney really believe that Satan and Jesus are brothers, or at least third cousins, once removed?
The attacks on Romney’s religion have likewise come from his primary opponents rather than the Left. I have seen no evidence that his personal religious beliefs have interfered with his policy decisions, so it should be a non-issue.
Is Giuliani, who contributed to pro-choice organizations, flying under false colors as a Catholic?
The same was done to Kerry and both times the questions originated for the Right. This should not be an issue, though it invariably becomes one for any pro-choice Catholic (mostly Dems).
The evolution question was asked of all candidates of both parties with the exception of Fred.
It seems you are seeing bias against your guys because you want to see it.
