DavidS @35. Oh man not that discredited pile of crap again? Here we have a bunch of “unofficial notes” and the leftist media manipulating the information and drawing conclusions that ignore reality and you claim it is proof? The only people ever to take these personal memos seriously are leftist conspiracy theorists hoping to advance your “war crimes” bull.
Here is proof that those memos are nothing but bunk.
In fact, some people have clearly pointed out that this memo is likely to be as accurate as the Bush TANG papers Rather tried to sell us.
When Blair and Bush met to discuss Iraq their argument was that Saddam was not complying with the UN sanctions and needed to be forced to comply and unless he did there would be military action against him. In fact Saddam continued to flaunt the sanctions until the first bombs dropped on Iraq in 2003. He did so because Russia, China, and France, whom all here sucking in millions in illegal oil trades and did not want to see the gravy Saddam was giving them go away, promised Saddam they would block any US action in the UN like they had before, but failed to realize that this time the US meant business. Of course it looks like Blair and Bush where discussing war as the only option with Saddam not complying. But let’s not attribute the fact Blair & Bush where talking that they might have no other option but force to get Saddam in compliance to Saddam. No let us instead pretend t was an evil conspiracy because after all we want to accuse Bush of war crimes.
What are you going to use next to accuse Bush of war crimes? Link me to the millions of articles claiming that 9-11 was an inside job by the US government so they could go steal Iraqi oil?
Quit while you are ahead please!
