A Comment About

Can the RNC’s New Man of Steele Revive the Party?

February 1, 2009 - 12:00 am - by Jennifer Rubin
shrubnose
2009-02-02 08:54:12

101.Jeff Perren: You are mistaken Mr. Perren. Your problem is you do not follow Ayn Rands ideas through to their possible end result. Her ideas would,if carried through to their logical conclusion result in one person owning the entire world . The rest of us could either work for that person or starve. That would be our free choice (no violence or force there!).Any restrictions placed on the right of any one individual to totally control this planet regardless of the effect on others would go against Ayn Rands basic ideas ( now that’s individualism and capitalism – reason – I’ll leave that up to you! ). If you do not understand that, you need to go back and read a little more of what Ms Rand wrote .Your mistake is that you do not carry her ideas forward enough,you stop where you feel comfortable. you degrade her doctrine. You are NOT a good follower of Ayn Rand. You just do not understand what she has said . Maybe you could call Alan Greenspan and get him to explain Ayn Rand’s ideas. He is a really smart guy ! But his explanations might be a little hard for you to understand with the fed-speak thing. Have a nice day. Don’t stay up late waiting for the GOP to come back. As I have said, Ayn Rand wasted a lot of paper and peoples times. She is a fairly good example of the dictum ” No matter how many books you load on the back of a jackass, the jackass is still a jackass”. Get it ? If not, get with Mr GW Bush .