Anthropogenic Global Warming: The Greatest Fraud in History?
The term ‘greenhouse gas” is therefore a generalization from the lab to the hypercomplex, nonlinear, and incompletely known earth. The actual ‘greenhouse signature” of C02 in the atmosphere is far too small in a hypercomplex system to attribute causality in raising temperatures.
This is nonsense. If it weren’t for the greenhouse effect, the Earth would be about 33`K cooler. I don’t even know what you mean by “greenhouse signature” and why you assume it’s “too small.”
Since Greenhouse gases are interdependent, it’s hard to measure exactly how much CO2 contributes, but it contributes at the minimum, 9% of the greenhouse effect. This number is undisputed in the scientific literature and dates from Ramanathan and Coakley, 1978.
And, BTW, the development of MODTRAN and other radiation codes (in the 1940s, mostly by the US military) relied on meticulous observations of the “hypercomplex” atmosphere. The resulting IR profile has been used for decades for a wide variety of applications. It’s accuracy has been confirmed again and again through the years.
So, stop making stuff up and actually research the topics you write about.
