That’s interesting, because with the exception of a few, the friends I have who were homeschooled are ill equipped for the world in both literacy and math, not to mention their social skills are virtually non existent.
In regard to abortion, Paul and I do not agree for the simple reason that he contradicts himself in his view. He is clearly pro-life, believes that life begins at conception (sponsored the Sanctity of Life Act), and believes that abortion seriously undermines liberty, but would leave it up to the states to decide. The reason I don’t agree is that if Ron Paul believes that liberty is being undermined for what he honestly believes is a living person, it’s clearly a Constitutional violation of individiual liberty. States rights in regard to abortion do not trump individual rights in the eyes of the Constitution. No compromise. It’s not hard to see the contradiction and I don’t know why more people don’t see it for exactly what it is: a cop out on a talking point.
